Health equity in economic and trade policies

Process to date for WHO's Intergovenmental Working Group on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights: An African perspective
Misati, ME

This paper presented at the second regional meeting of the Africal Civil Society Coalition on the Intergovenmental Working Group on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights in Arusha, Tanzania, 3-4 April 2008 highlights the process in developing AFRO's approach to the negotiations, the common AFRO position(s), and achievements and challenges so far. A number of concerns have been incorporated in the Draft Strategy and Plan of Action progress report, while some interests are not yet realised because either the respective issues have not yet been negotiated or no consensus has yet been reached on them.

Statement to the African member states of the World Health Organisation on the Intergovernmental Working Group on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property
The African Civil Society Coalition on IGWG, 4 April 2008, Arusha

The African Civil Society Coalition on IGWG statement reiterates commitment to the ongoing WHO initiative to develop a Global Strategy and Plan of Action on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property. It reaffirms that there is an urgent need for action to improve access to medicines for people in developing countries. People cannot access the medicines they need; The economic, social and political determinants of illness are not being sufficiently addressed; The pharmaceutical market is not driven by public health interests, but by commercial interests; Patent protection and high prices are two of the barriers blocking poor people’s access to medicines; Funding for research, development and access (RDA) to medicines is insufficient; There is a lack of innovation for medicines for many of the diseases prevalent in our countries; Health interests of poor people are neglected by the profit-driven pharmaceutical market.

Further details: /newsletter/id/33102
The EU’s approach to Free Trade Agreements: Intellectual Property
ActionAid International, Christian Aid, Oxfam International: EU FTA manual, Briefing 8

This paper forms part of a series of eight briefings on the European Union’s approach to Free Trade Agreements. It aims to explain EU policies, procedures and practices to those interested in supporting developing countries. It is not intended to endorse any particular policy or position, rather to inform decisions and provide the means to better defend them. The views expressed in the briefings do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers.

Uganda: Civil Society Vows to Stop EPA
Olanyo J: The Monitor (Kampala), 28 March 2008

As the recently initialled interim Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) continues to take centre stage, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) in Africa have vowed to step up their stop-EPA campaign saying the pact has contentious issues. CSO's converging in Kampala for a three-day eastern and southern Africa regional forum reported concern about some clauses in the agreement, which they contend are not developmental and should be rolled back. They cited clauses which call for free trade opening, non application of export taxes and the provision that once you sign an agreement it can't be open for negotiations.

WHO Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG) on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property
Mubangizi, P

This presentation was given at the second meeting of the African Civil Society Coalition on the Intergovernmental Working Group in Arusha, Tanzania, 3-4 April 2008. It provides basic information on the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health (CIPIH), regarding its mandate and the implementation of its recommendations. One of these recommendations was to establish an intergovernmental working group (IGWG) to draw up a global strategy and plan of action in order to provide a medium-term framework based on the recommendations of the Commission. The aims of the strategy and plan of action are to secure an enhanced and financially sustainable basis for needs-driven, essential health research and development relevant to diseases that disproportionately affect developing countries.

Aid effectiveness: overview of the results 2006 survey on monitoring the Paris Declaration: How can donor countries fulfil the Paris Declaration commitments?
DAC-OECD Working Party on Aid Effectiveness and Donor Practices, 2007

This document presents the first volume of results from a survey on the Paris Declaration. It provides an overview of the key findings across the 34 countries involved, as well as assessing the survey process and setting out key conclusions and recommendations. Key implications of the survey that are highlighted include higher expectation levels for reform, deeper ownership and more accountable institutions, and increasing aid efficiency together with donor harmonisation. The authors suggest that aid effectiveness issues and results need to be discussed more explicitly at country level, and credible monitoring mechanisms need to be developed. If countries and donors are to accelerate progress towards achieving the Paris Declaration commitments, it is recommended that: partner countries must deepen their ownership of the development process; donors need to support these efforts by making better use of partners' capacity; to further harmonisation, donors must work aggressively to reduce the transaction costs of delivering and managing aid; and to begin addressing mutual accountability commitments, countries and donors should clearly define a mutual action agenda.

EPAs a threat to services and investment
Zwane, T: The Swazi Observer

Although the Swazi government has reaffirmed its commitment to the second phase of negotiations towards a full EPA (economic partnership agreement) with the European Union (EU), which relates to trade in services and investment, economists continue to argue that it will be detrimental to the domestic industry. Economist Thembinkosi Dlamini stated: “If one looks at the EPA for what it really is, it is clear that it wants those things that are under the Doha Development Agenda, that is, trade in services and investment as well as government procurement.” He said that Swaziland or the Southern African Development Community (SADC) would not be able to compete with a European company for trade in services.

European Trade Deal Challenges Unity
Khumalo N, AllAfrica.com, 6 March 2008

Trade talks between the European Union and southern African countries have opened up serious differences between Europe and South Africa, and between South Africa and her neighbours. At the heart of the difficulties are the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) which countries of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) grouping are negotiating to get preferential access to European markets. A number of southern African countries have just signed an Interim EPA (IEPA) with Europe but South Africa has baulked at signing, threatening the future of the Southern African Customs Union – the world's oldest.Resolving the difficulties will require a lot of political will and sensitivity from both South Africa and the EU, writes AllAfrica guest columnist Nkululeko Khumalo of the South African Institute of International Affairs.

Examining the effects of debt on the provision of healthcare
Jubilee Debt Campaign, 2007

Developing country governments will struggle to invest in decent public health facilities when valuable resources are needed to service debt. However, the evidence is that debt relief works to alleviate healthcare shortages - spending on health in countries that have received debt cancellation has risen by seventy percent. The report calls for urgent action to ensure developing countries’ can provide adequate healthcare: rich countries, institutions and commercial creditors must cancel all illegitimate (i.e. due to ‘unfair or irresponsible’ lending) and unpayable debts being claimed from all poor countries, not just those eligible for the Highly Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) Initiative; creditors should recognise debtor governments’ accountability to their own citizens, and not impose economic policies through conditions on debt relief or loans. This includes conditions limiting public spending or specifying how healthcare should be delivered; and southern governments must abide by the demands of their citizens that funds from debt cancellation be used to improve essential public services – and the governments must be open and accountable to their people over the use and monitoring of these funds.

From Paris 2005 to Accra 2008: will aid become more accountable and effective?: A critical approach to the aid effectiveness agenda
International Civil Society Steering Group for the Accra High Level Forum: CSO Parallel Process to the Ghana High Level Forum Network, 2007

The paper argues that politics is central to aid effectiveness and the measures should be taken to ensure democratic ownership of citizens in recipient countries. It argues that aid must ensure mutual accountability between donors, government and citizens. Furthermore, donors need to ensure high standards of aid quality by fairly allocating aid toward poverty reduction, untying aid and limiting technical assistance, as well as ensuring predictability for recipient countries. The paper makes a number of recommendations ahead of the Accra High Level Forum on aid effectiveness, which include: donors should recognise the centrality of poverty reduction, equality and human rights; all donor-imposed policy conditionality should be ended; donors and Southern governments must adhere to the highest standards of openness and transparency; donors should recognise CSOs as development actors in their own right and acknowledge the conditions that enable them to play effective roles in development; an effective and relevant independent monitoring and evaluation system for the Paris Declaration and its impact on development outcomes should be developed; mutually agreed, transparent and binding contracts to govern aid relationships should be introduced; and new multi-stakeholder mechanisms for holding governments and donors to account should be created.

Pages