To improve communication of research to policy-makers it will be necessary to strengthen researchers' communication skills; aim for close collaboration between researchers and policy-makers; construct an appropriate platform from which to communicate and strengthen institutional policy capacity for uptake. To improve communication of research to other researchers the strengthening of Southern research capacity is needed in order to enable Southern researchers to access Northern-produced research. Lastly, in order to improve communication of research to the poor and organisations working with the poor it will be necessary to incorporate communication activities into project design. This is according to a working paper from the Overseas Development Institute in the United Kingdom.
Monitoring equity and research policy
Health research generates knowledge that can be utilized to improve health system performance and, ultimately, health and health equity. The authors of this article propose a conceptual framework for health research systems (HRSs) that defines their boundaries, components, goals, and functions. The framework adopts a systems perspective towards HRSs and serves as a foundation for constructing a practical approach to describe and analyse HRSs. The analysis of HRSs should, in turn, provide a better understanding of how research contributes to gains in health and health equity.
Translating the discoveries of clinical research into practice is vital, as the UK’s Academy of Medical Sciences says in a recent report. But what do doctors in developing countries face in trying to keep up with the task? In this article, the authors say the challenges are legion. Medical academics in the developing world tend to work far from clinics. They often teach huge classes and bear heavy workloads, and struggle with poor salaries and little access to new findings in biomedicine. The research they conduct is all too often underfunded and irrelevant to national needs.
Uganda is widely regarded as an HIV/AIDS success story, but the reality of this claim has rarely been critically investigated. Although evidence-based medicine is increasingly important, analysis of the Ugandan epidemiological situation shows that the so-called proof accepted for policy recommendations can be subject to creative interpretation. There are several policy lessons that can be learned from the response to HIV/AIDS in Uganda, where declining prevalence rates of HIV-1 have been reported in a number of surveillance sites around the country since 1992. (This article requires registration.)
A gap often exists between research findings and the desired outcome of putting them into use to improve health service delivery, policies, and practices. But this issue of Network highlights several factors that can facilitate the speed and ease of moving research to practice. How various factors can coincide to produce rapid utilization of research findings is illustrated by acceptance of the antiretroviral nevirapine to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV in the developing world.
The growing global burden of non-communicable diseases in poor countries and poor populations has been neglected by policy makers, major multilateral and bilateral aid donors, and academics. Despite strong evidence for the magnitude of this burden, the preventability of its causes, and the threat it poses to already strained health care systems, national and global actions have been inadequate. A full range of policy responses is required from government and non-governmental agencies, but unfortunately the capacity and resources for this response are insufficient, and governments need to respond appropriately.
Uganda is widely regarded as an HIV/AIDS success story, but the reality of this claim has rarely been critically investigated. Although evidence-based medicine is increasingly important, analysis of the Ugandan epidemiological situation shows that the so-called proof accepted for policy recommendations can be subject to creative interpretation. There are several policy lessons that can be learned from the response to HIV/AIDS in Uganda. (registration needed)
The term 'policy process' is based on the notion that policies are formulated and implemented in particular social and historical contexts, and that these contexts matter - for which issues are put on the policy agenda, for the shape of policies and policy institutions, for budget allocations, for the implementation process and for the outcome of the policies. The idea of 'policy process' stands opposed to that of 'policy as prescription', which assumes that policies are the result of a rational process of problem identification by a benevolent agency (usually the state). While the 'policy as prescription' approach is still important - both in much of the public administration literature as well as in the heads of many policy-makers - there is a fast expanding body of literature that analyses, explains or conceptualises the process dimensions of policy. This literature is a blend of political science, sociology and anthropology. It does not assume that policies are 'natural phenomena' or 'automatic solutions' resulting from particular social problems and it does not privilege the state as an actor fundamentally different from other social actors. The why, how and by whom questions are treated as empirical questions; it is only concrete empirical research that can generate the answers. It is this body of literature that is included in this bibliography.
This paper explores the dynamics of the making and shaping of poverty policy. It begins with a critique of linear versions of policy-making, highlighting the complex interplay of power, knowledge and agency in poverty policy processes, arguing that the policy process involves a complex configuration of interests whose interactions are shaped by power relations.
Several African governments have in recent years set themselves ambitious poverty reduction strategies. What impact have the institutional mechanisms had for mainstreaming the goal of poverty-reduction into processes of government decision-making? Preliminary findings from current research on institutional and process issues in national poverty policy at IDS suggests that practice on policy processes and institutions relating to poverty reduction has improved. In many sub-Saharan African countries, there has been considerable progress in information collection about poverty levels, characteristics and trends and, increasingly, an attempt to find mechanisms to ensure that the evidence on poverty informs the design of policy. Perhaps the most fundamental evidence of a heightened focus on poverty reduction in policy concerns the extent to which it is identified as a priority in a country’s national development strategy.