The objective of this paper is to review experiences of ARV programmes already under way in countries with very big HIV epidemics but severely constrained resources, as in most of Africa and part of the Caribbean. Its aim is to show how some of the key policy issues for scaling up HIV/AIDS treatment have been dealt with and to identify common elements that should be considered by all who seek to provide HIV/AIDS care on a significant scale. The paper demonstrates that ARV programmes now under way in developing countries have successfully capitalised on existing resources and infrastructure through the use of standardised treatment regimens, simplified monitoring procedures and making use of available human resources, including communities and family members.
Resource allocation and health financing
This article examines quality of services following decentralization to districts in Zambia, and an analysis of data assessing allocation choices, as well as some indicators of the performance of the health systems under decentralization. Decentralization allowed the districts to make decisions on internal allocation of resources and on user fee levels and expenditures. Findings suggest that decentralization may not have had either a positive or negative impact on services.
The aim of this report commissioned by the Southern African Regional Network on Equity in Health (EQUINET) was to review the evidence for community participation in health, in terms of community contribution to health planning, resource allocation, and service delivery. In terms of resource allocation, it has been observed that communities in Africa and other developing countries have mostly been mobilised to participate in cost recovery programs such as payment of user fees or community-based health care prepayment schemes, as stipulated under the Bamako Initiative of 1988 and as supported by the World Bank through its World Development Report of 1993 'Investing In Health'. Public participation in resource allocation has also been interpreted in terms of people's contributions of efforts such as labour or money to construct or renovate health facilities or other services such as water projects and schools, with substantial assistance from their governments or external donors.
This report analyses the costs and resource requirements associated with the provision of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy in the public health sector in Zambia. It provides per-patient cost estimates for highly active anti-retroviral therapy, voluntary counselling and testing, several opportunistic infections, and prevention of mother-to-child transmission services. These per-patient cost estimates are used to project total program costs, which are then compared to currently budgeted resources with an emphasis on financial sustainability.
This paper produced by the Access to Essential Medicines Campaign uses the example of a poor township 30 kilometres outside Cape Town to find out if antiretroviral therapy is possible in severely resource-constrained environments and to discover the best ways to deliver these drugs. AZT first became available in Khayelitsha township's two maternity wards in early 1999, and the programme has subsequently become one of the continent's biggest. Treatment was initially limited to opportunistic infections, but in May 2001, this was broadened to include antiretroviral therapy (ART), making the project the first to use antiretrovirals in government health facilities outside the context of clinical trials.
This report from Partners for Health Reformplus analyses the costs and resource requirements associated with the provision of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy in the public health sector in Zambia. It provides per-patient cost estimates for highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART), voluntary counselling and testing, several opportunistic infections, and prevention of mother-to-child transmission services. These per-patient cost estimates are used to project total program costs, which are then compared to currently budgeted resources with an emphasis on financial sustainability.
HIV has severely affected the overall health of people in the southern Africa region by impacting directly on individuals and their families, and by placing additional burdens on economies, social structures and health services. Poorer people are disproportionately affected because they have fewer resources to deal with the impact of HIV on their daily lives. Now that international advocacy has led to reductions in process of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs), there is concern that poorer people will not have access to these drugs. To examine these issues, a study was commissioned by the Regional Network for Equity in Health in Southern Africa (EQUINET) and Oxfam GB to highlight equity issues in HIV and AIDS, health sector responses and treatment access in four countries in southern Africa.
Total funding for the response to AIDS in the world's low- and middle-income countries is only half of what will be required in 2005 to effectively confront the epidemic, according to a Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/ AIDS. This report, presented at ICASA 2003 in Nairobi, assesses current global commitments to addressing HIV/AIDS. It states that, despite the fact that the pandemic has recently reached the top of the African and international agenda, resources are still nowhere near sufficient.
Is public expenditure in developing countries inefficient and biased against the poor? How could better aid delivery enhance the likelihood of achieving Millenium Development Goals (MDGs)? What changes are required in current patterns of public expenditure and monitoring and in donor-recipient relations?
Many health inequalities are due to unequal access to society's resources. In theory, they are avoidable - but how? The international community tends to define health equity as 'equality of health status'. But is this the most useful approach in developing countries? Researchers working with Namibia's Ministry of Health and Social Services (MHSS) think not.
The researchers suggest that developing countries should focus on improving fairness in the allocation of healthcare resources.