In this report, the author found that proprietary rights on “influenza genetic sequences and the proteins they encode, used in vaccines,” get in the way of developing countries’ access to medicines. The study shows a sharp rise in patent applications in this area since 2006, shortly after the outbreak of H5N1 in late 2005. The study lists a series of examples of patent applications, such as Baxter International, for the production of influenza vaccines, published in July 2010. This patent application includes animal and human H5N1 types from China, Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia, Turkey, and Singapore. According to the author, developing countries “collect and share influenza viruses with WHO’s Global Influenza Surveillance Network with the understanding that those viruses are to be used for public health.” However, proprietary claims can prevent access to technology and products produced with a given technology, he said.
Health equity in economic and trade policies
The report notes that poor-quality, or "substandard", medicines threaten patients and public health in developing countries. Prioritisation of medicines regulation by developing-country governments, with the technical and financial support of rich countries, is badly needed. Yet under the guise of helping to address dangerous and ineffective medicines, rich countries are pushing for new intellectual-property rules and reliance on police - rather than health regulatory - action. This approach will not ensure that medicines consistently meet quality standards. Worse, new intellectual property rules can undermine access to affordable generic medicines and damage public health. Developing countries must improve medicines regulation - not expand intellectual-property enforcement - in order to ensure medicine quality.
The United Nations has been enjoined in a court case in Kenya case challenging a potential threat to supply of generic drugs for HIV and AIDS. It claimed enforcement of the Anti-Counterfeit Act 2008 would endanger the lives of people infected. The High Court in Nairobi heard those affected would not access affordable and essential drugs. The UN Special Rapporteur indicated his wish to intervene as an interested party to support the constitutional principles of access to essential medicines, according to advocate Ombati Omwanza. Justice Daniel Musinga allowed Anand Grover to represent the UN in the suit. The court allowed importation of generic anti-retrovirals, pending the hearing and determination of this case. The interim order issued in April 2010 was aimed at saving the lives of those living with the virus. The judge’s interim order stopped the implementation of three sections of the new Anti-Counterfeit Act.
This review by the Chinese ambassador to Botswana marks the 35th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the China and Botswana. According to the ambassador, trade and technical co-operation serve as the driving force behind bilateral relations between the two countries, as China considers mutually beneficial co-operation as more important and useful than unilateral assistance. The Chinese government has also undertaken technical exchanges and transfers with Botswana, notably in agriculture and health. From the 1970s to 1980s, China helped train a group of agriculture technical personnel from Botswana and sent experts to conduct local land survey and planning projects. Three Chinese senior agricultural experts are now helping Botswana in agricultural policy making and improving farming technology. In health and medicine, China has sent medical teams to Botswana since 1980, like the Twelfth Team, comprising 40 medical staff and six support staff, who provide medical services in public hospitals in Gaborone and Francistown. In the review, the ambassador acknowledges that his country aims to further scale up human resources development as an important component of bilateral relations. Since 1999 almost 300 Botswana officials and technicians have attended seminars, workshops and short-term training programmes in China – covering areas of administrative management, commerce, information etc – and the number is set to increase.
The Graduate Institute’s Global Health Programme, in cooperation with the University of Ottawa, held a public seminar at the Institute in April 2011 to discuss the threat that fake and substandard medicines pose to public health and the potential role of the World Health Organisation (WHO) in resolving this daunting health challenge. A major theme running throughout the seminar was the need to redress the critical imbalance in the provision of international legal tools to tackle the illicit trade and criminal production of fake medicines. A complete legal system would address both the positive challenge, to promote greater access to safe, WHO-qualified treatments, as well as the negative challenge, to stop criminal activity and bogus treatments that are intentionally fraudulent, illicitly traded and sold. Currently, the global system lacks balance, with most legal tools addressing the issue of counterfeit medicines. In other words, the international system is currently more prepared to tackle this issue as a violation of intellectual property rights rather than as a significant danger to public health.
One of the action plans emerging from the Forum on China-Africa Co-operation – the main platform for Chinese-African relations – is the Sharm El Sheikh Action Plan, in which the Chinese government committed itself over the period 2010-2012 to, among other things, send 50 agricultural technology teams to Africa and help train 2,000 African agricultural technicians, build and implement 20 agricultural technology demonstration centres in Africa, and implement 100 joint research and demonstration projects to aid science and technology transfer. The government has also committed to contribute medical equipment and malaria-fighting materials worth 500 million yuan (US$76.35 million) to 30 hospitals and 30 malaria prevention and treatment centres built by China for Africa in the three-year period. China will invite African professionals working in the field of malaria to attend training programmes in China in an effort to ensure sustainable development of the project. The country will also help relevant African countries train a total of 3,000 doctors, nurses and administrative personnel. Africa and China pledged to scale up joint efforts to prevent and treat major communicable diseases like HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, avian influenza and influenza A (H1N1). The two sides will continue to enhance co-operation in setting up mechanisms to handle public health emergencies.
In this essay, the author considers the impact of the India-Brazil-SouthAfrica (IBSA) and the Brazil-Russia-India-China (BRIC) summits on South-South co-operation and development. In terms of the health sector, the author argues that IBSA and BRIC offer synergies among the countries in the alliances. As regards HIV/AIDS, for instance, the interests of the three countries are quite convergent. India has the second largest number of HIV-positive people (2.4 million) and also the largest generic drugs industry. Brazil has developed role-model public policies in fighting AIDS and exports its know-how to several African, Asian and Latin American countries. South Africa has a high demand in this regard, since it has the largest number of HIV-positive people (5.7 million) and faces severe constraints in democratising public health services regarding the epidemic. In recent years the IBSA countries have been prominent in the G-21 lobby that succeeded in lessening the negative effects of the Trade-Related Aspects Of Intellectual Property Rights agreement (TRIPS). Flexibilities in TRIPS permit governments to issue licenses for generic drug production for the domestic market in the interests of public health, without the consent of the patent owner, to help bring down the high costs for patented drugs in developing countries. India is one of the world’s leading producers of generic medicines. While a trilateral trade agreement has been alluded to on numerous occasions, the author alleges it is unlikely to materialise between India, Brazil and South Africa, which are technically bound to regional trade blocs.
According to this article, China has become one of Africa's leading trading partners, with trade totaling US$106.8 billion in 2008, up 45 per cent from the previous year. China's increasing demand for raw materials to fuel its domestic growth has resulted in agreements on access to and extraction of minerals and oil from resource-rich African countries. China has also become an emerging player in providing financial assistance for infrastructure development in Africa, helping African countries address their infrastructure needs such as railways, hydropower and roads. China has sought to provide concessional financing for infrastructure and construction projects through its Export-Import Bank, often using Chinese companies to carry out the projects. Since 200, China's foreign policy in the region has been directed through the Forum on China-Africa Co-operation (FOCAC), which is the main vehicle for China's activities in Africa, providing a multilateral platform for dialogue with a view to reaching mutually agreeable goals. A number of action plans have emerged from FOCAC, which outline commitments to Africa by the Chinese government, such as the 2009 Sharm El Sheikh Action Plan, in which the Chinese government commits itself to finance the training of African nurses, as well as contribute to malaria health services by supplying equipment and anti-malaria drugs.
A decade ago, the anti-malaria drug artemisin – available only from the sweet wormwood plant, Artemisia annua – was scarce and expensive. But by 2007, the market was wallowing in a surfeit of the drug as farmers flocked to grow the crop. Now, as a US$343-million initiative starts to battle malaria through hugely subsidised medicines, suppliers are again worried that there will not be enough artemisinin to go around, while farmers, plant breeders and synthetic biologists are hoping that they can snap the drug out of its roller-coaster supply cycle. Farmers and scientists are struggling to keep up with needs of ambitious medicine-subsidy programme, the article notes. The authors observe that artemisin yields could be improved by planting new Artemisia strains. On average, one kilogram of its dried leaves yields some 8 grams of artemisinin. Researchers have used selective breeding to create hybrid plants that produce up to 24 grams, according to a British Artemisia breeding consortium. These plants are now being grown and harvested commercially in Madagascar, and trialled in South Africa, Uganda, Zimbabwe and the United States, as well as in Britain.
The author of this paper argues for public-private partnerships to help deliver locally produced generics in Africa, and against protectionism in favour of open market access. He points to promising developments, such as experienced Indian and Western pharmaceutical firms undertaking original research and development and partnering with firms in African countries. He believes this investment by reputable companies should help ensure quality drugs are produced by furnishing the technical expertise that overcomes capacity constraints. Local production enterprises in Africa will allow international companies to diversify their supply sources, the author argues, guarding against potentially disastrous shocks such as a natural disaster that would destroy an Artemisia crop and send the price of artemisinin-based malaria drugs skyrocketing. Local production partnerships could encourage trade, especially because the bulk active ingredients needed to produce them still come most efficiently from abroad. Partnerships between foreign pharmaceutical firms and African companies may also help train a pool of skilled workers, improving a country’s long-term development prospects.