Public-private partnerships are becoming a popular mode of tackling large, complicated, and expensive public health problems. The idea of partnerships for public health has emerged in national and international policy discussions, in both rich and poor countries. Yet we are still learning about how best to manage these new partnerships, as is discussed in this book.
Public-Private Mix
This report, from Rational Pharmaceutical Management (RPM) Plus, examines a number of innovative field interventions to increase access to medicines for child health through the private sector in Tanzania. The first part of the report details a number of programmes and interventions that are currently in operation in Tanzania. These include projects on: shopkeeper interventions; low-interest loans to Accredited Drug Dispensing Outlets (ADDOs); voucher schemes; and microfinance schemes.
Global Public Goods for Health addresses the growing globalization of health from the unique perspective of the economic concept of public goods. This concept identifies where a ‘good’ or service (such as knowledge of an infectious disease outbreak) which would be of benefit globally will not be produced or disseminated if left to ‘the market’, because of a lack of incentive: no-one can be excluded from accessing the good, no charge can be levied for use and no costs recouped.
Poverty is a major factor in the continuing burden of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. The gross national product (GNP) per capita is around US$306, or less than $1 per day. On average, these countries spend less than $20 per head of population per year on health care. Patients urgently need new therapies to combat malaria. However, malaria is not an economically viable disease for drug developers and new antimalarials are therefore usually developed within public–private partnerships.
Speaking in December at the 14th International Conference on HIV/AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections in Africa (ICASA), in Abuja, Nigeria, Jim Yong Kim, Director of the World Health Organization (WHO) HIV/AIDS Department, emphasized the importance of a public health approach in promoting long-term sustainability and equity of HIV treatment access programmes in resource-limited settings.
Each year 100 million people slide into poverty as a result of medical care payments. Another 150 million people are forced to spend nearly half their incomes on medical expenses. That is because in many countries people have no access to social health protection - affordable health insurance or government-funded health services. Paradoxically, people in the world’s poorest countries contribute relatively more for health care than those in wealthy industrialized nations. In Germany, for example, where the average GDP per capita is US$ 32 860 and almost everyone has social health protection, 10% of all medical expenses nationwide are borne by households.
Taking as point of departure the need for a strong public health care sector in developing countries the article firstly outlines how in sub-Saharan Africa enhanced scarcity has characterized the content and quality of health care in the public sector. This has eroded the trust among the public in the government as provider of health care and guardian of public health. Secondly, it describes how workers in the public health domain have dealt with the implications of scarcity by etching out a "puvate" zone in health care provision and how these informal activities need to be interpreted as "muddling through".
This report from the World Health Organization summarises proceedings from an international working group meeting on public-private sector mix (PPM) programmes for expanding DOTS (directly observed treatment, short-course), the internationally recognised TB control strategy. The meeting stressed that effective scale-up of PPM DOTS must ensure access to TB care for all population groups. Key barriers to scaling up PPM DOTS included lack of capacity for technical support at national, regional and global levels, and weak advocacy and promotion.
The Department of Health’s recently released Draft Charter of the Public and Private Health Sectors (CPPHS) aims to address the legacy of apartheid restraint on access to health care for all South Africans. It commits public and private sectors to create “a health care system that is coherent, cost-effective and quality driven … for the benefit of the entire population” and to work together “to improve the scope, accessibility and quality of care at all levels”. For these laudable goals we give our wholehearted support. The CPPHS specifies four “key areas” of transformation: access to health services, equity in health services, quality of health services, and Black Economic Empowerment (BEE). The first three – access to, equity in, and quality of health care services, are essential (though not enough) to meet the goal of health for all South Africans. The fourth area is problematic.
"The privatization of state-owned enterprises has been among the most controversial of market reforms. This new edited volume brings together a comprehensive set of country studies on the effects of privatization on people-and answers the overarching question: who are the winners and losers of the wave of privatizations that swept across the developing world in the 1980s and 1990s? The studies are sophisticated and careful, and address the big questions: Are the poorest households paying more for water, power, and other basic services? Did those who lost jobs suffer permanent declines in income? Were state assets sold at prices that were too low, and who benefited from the resulting windfalls? Was the process, in laypersons' terms, fair?"